Copied from Celtiberos vs. IMPERIAL II.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Tomi says |
Default vs. Selection Advancement |
Lead | |
|
Copied from Celtiberos vs. IMPERIAL II.
Last Edited By: Tomi says 06-13-09 13:26:41.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||
INDIGO KNIAZ |
|||
|
Hi m8's!
When can you play? Standart rules, 3vs3, 4 ships per player, what you think?
Last Edited By: INDIGO KNIAZ
06-07-09 23:35:29.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
Hi Indigo,
Cya.
Last Edited By: CeltiberoLerend
06-11-09 10:38:04.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
CeltiberoLerend wrote: No, never had a rule like that (I don't think so anyway). Advancing by default of the other Team is involuntary and can happen to anyone, even multiple times through no fault of their own. There is an unwritten standard that a Team can only be advanced one time in Match selection, as that is something that can be controlled (the name drawn is held, and the next name draw is applied in their place). To my immediate memory, Devoti Custodes in the Second Round Naval Contest, and Clan LONG II and XXI RAPAX in this Round's Contests, are the only Teams
advanced so far in this Competition.
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-11-09 11:08:27.
Edited 4 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
Hi Tomi,
Well, i explained myself badly what i meant due my bad translation of default´s word meaning. What i meant is what i understood based on past experiences, this is, a team can´t advance without playing 2 times within the same contest if exists another team/s which hadn´t enjoyed that situation yet (advance a round without playing).
Correct me if i´m wrong Tomi but i think we get the closer evidence of this matter past year in "Royal Crown Competition - Spring 2008 First Round" when XXI Rapax team II was advanced to the second round after a win by default on Cojot team II:
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/718
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/677
While some weeks later the same situation as we live today arose during "Royal Crown Competition - Spring 2008 Third Round" when XXI Rapax team II was going to be advanced again although this time due the odd number of the still alive contestants (exactly like now), and Raiola2 of the Invictus Clan asked you about this question (advance several rounds without playing) to what you answered he was absolutely right and finally giving the pass to the only Clan which hadn´t enjoyed it yet in that contest, the Celtis:
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/736
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/737
As you may have noticed both situations aren´t very similar but almost identical with a XXI Rapax team win by default on XII Fulminata team (they only had 3 players to play navals) in the Second Round of actual Naval Contest:
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/967
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/949
And some weeks later the same again due the odd number of the still alive contestants:
http://clanwars3540.yuku.com/topic/1017
Following this reasoning, in the actual Contest both XXI Rapax and HG Clans already have advanced a round without playing so i believe both Imperial and Celtiberos Clans should have had at least that chance also.
Anyways, we like and are used to win in the battlefields not in the offices. I only wanted to let you know about this possible unfair situation.
Cya. |
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
Ok, I see. According to the order of the draw; 1. Celtiberos
RAPAX is the odd Team, but because they were advanced before (previous default) the draw returns to the top, and Celtiberos then would be the advanced Team, and RAPAX would take their place. Is this correct?
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-11-09 23:41:45.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
Well,
i´m just an emissary Tomi and don´t know the way you take that kind of decisions. To my understanding i must to represent as fairly as can the interests of my Clan, that´s all. Imho my job finishes there Tomi. Cya.
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
RAPAX is the odd Team, but because they were advanced before (previous default) the draw returns to the top, and Celtiberos then would be the advanced Team, and RAPAX would take their place. I was just cutting to the chase (end scene). The rule was originally intended to refer to Match Assignment selection advancements, but I now seem to recall that there was another dual default advancement that it was applied to, or at least where the argument was raised, and the Matching was modified to rectify the situation. But never before were the two different advancements considered cumulative (added together), most likely because the situation had not occurred. They should be, and will be, using the same skip method as same-Clan draw bypass outlined above. If there are no objections, the correction will be issued this evening, with this Match changed to XXI RAPAX vs. IMPERIAL II, and with
Celtiberos on the bench (advanced to the next Round).
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-12-09 11:06:18.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
INDIGO KNIAZ |
|||
|
Hola Lerend.
I think we can play on next week. |
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
I already have an objection myself, and that is the first observation.
You can not correct for a default-advancement with a selection-advancement unless you can always do it, and you can't. It is possible for a Team to have a succession of defaults where there is no imbalance in matching to correct the accumulation of advancements. The only time that there was a default-advancement correction, it was an order of a three-way Match rearrangement, having nothing to do with selection-advancements to the next Round (I remember now). So we will not mix the two, and the Match scheduled will remain as is. Again Good Luck All!
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-12-09 11:32:19.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
With all respects Tomi,
the problem shouldn´t arise when a Clan advances due consecutive defaults from its oponents (something involuntary and uncontrolled at all) but when a Clan advances next round with selection-advancements (controlled) system after had already enjoyed 1, 2 or 3 advances due default. This last case was what happened last year (yourself considered it unfair) and what is happening now again, something seems unfair to me not for us neither for IMP but for every Clan involved in a matter like we´re talking about atm. Cya.
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
I'm sorry Lerend, but what defaults are you talking about? The default-advancements in this contest so far are as follows: USSR
And the selection process is sacred, the only time there would ever be deviation from the draw, would be to bypass a same-Clan Match, which is in the rules, but has not ever happened yet. If we were to compensate as I had outlined above, what happens if in the next Round the compensated Team (yours) would through no fault of their own, be defaulted on? Then where is the justice for the Team that was taken out of legitimate selection-advancement according to the rules? What if the Team taken out of legitimate selection-advancement for having legitimate default-advancement(s), goes to play in this Round and is defaulted on again? I hope you see that this impossible to use selection-advancement to compensate for default-advancement(s). I will not work, and will not be used.
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-13-09 01:18:13.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
XXIRAPAXCaius wrote: Sorry, moved by mistake
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
For the record: In the Royal Crown Competition, in the First week we had three Team no-shows. This required a redraw of those left behind, and XXI RAPAX II was one of those. So in effect they were advanced from the First Week to the Restart of the First Round. This was technical default- advancement.
This was a selection- advancement. They played and won in the Second Round, and in the Third Round were originally selected as odd Team out a second time. This would have been a second selection-advancement. Raiola posted the objection, the draw with correction of the violation was reposted, with Celtiberos I switching positions for the odd draw advancement. This had nothing to do with the first default-advancement, the draw correction was the result of two selection-advancements of the same Team.
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-13-09 14:18:49.
Edited 4 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
Maybe you haven´t understood what i said in last post Tomi.
I believe is clear enough what i´m saying with this:
"the problem shouldn´t arise when a Clan advances due consecutive defaults from its oponents (something involuntary and uncontrolled at all) but when a Clan advances next round with selection-advancements (controlled) system after had already enjoyed 1, 2 or 3 advances due default."
In short, i mean the way the things work now 1 Clan could be in the final due, for example, 3 consecutive defaults from its opponents and 1 selection-advancement without playing a battle while others had had to play at least 6 to get the same place. Is this fair? Absolutely not. And, for example, 2 consecutive defaults and 1 selection-advancement? Absolutely not. And 1 default and 1 selection-advancement? Absolutely not as long as there is still 1 Clan which had played all its battles without having enjoyed a pass of any round without playing.
If we were to compensate as I had outlined above, what happens if in the next Round the compensated Team (yours) would through no fault of their own, be defaulted on? Then where is the justice for the Team that was taken out of legitimate selection-advancement according to the rules?
Tomi, and what if the already defaulted team in round before were compensated
this round and would through no fault of their own, be defaulted again on next round (obtaining 3 "bonus")? Where is supposed to be the justice for the rest of the Clans then?
I´ll answer your question with another one, how many times in the CWC history 1 Clan has won a final by default? None. Of course, for the most part of defaults arise in the first rounds when the path seems to be too long and difficult for some but never when you are about to finish the Contest. So the possible first rounds defaults (uncontrolled) could be easily controlled with posterior selection-advancements system. This way, no Clan would have more benefits than others which is what i try to defend from the begining.
What if the Team taken out of legitimate selection-advancement for having legitimate default-advancement(s), goes to play in this Round and is defaulted on again? It´s more than clear, advance by default from the opponents is out of control so that is not anyone´s fault and Clan must going on to the next round.
Summarizing, i really believed a Clan with an advance by default couldn´t have a posterior advance by selection system in the same contest
unless the rest ones had already enjoyed one. And what you explain now like a Rapax selection-advancement in first round last year i understood like a default
one due the incomparecence of Cojot Team II.
You lead here Tomi and we´ll respect your decision in spite of we believe this situation is pretty unfair and isn´t clear. We will play the round because, how i said before, we like and are used to win in the battlefields not in the offices. Anyways, we expect any formal and clear explanation about the selection-advancements rule system and default one you use to avoid such future problems or misunderstandings.
Cya.
|
|||
Tomi says |
|||
|
Just to share my personal point of view: True, in the end, the remaining team will be called a champion, no matter how they get to that point. Unfortunately some teams do not get the chance to prove their skills at every level on the way up. They can be deprived of an opponent by forfeit, default, or uneven matching. I do not see this as an advantage, as every match they do not actually get the opportunity to fight and win, lessens their sense of accomplishment. And should they succeed in the overall contest without significant accomplishments, their unearned victories will ring hollow in everyone's ears. There is no real advantage to advancement, except by winning… *bows*
"Teams left without opponents in matching will be advanced to the next Round. This will only be applied to a Team once in a given contest." This rule was left currently unwritten to minimize the rule set, as this function of management that is rarely applied, but always duly noted on application to a Battle Assignments at posting. Match default and withdrawal forfeit situations have nothing to do with the above rule, as they can happen to any Team, at any time, during any contest, through no choice or fault of their own.
Last Edited By: Tomi says
06-14-09 13:04:51.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
The most difficult thing having to play every round isn´t winning or losing, but negotiating rules, a date, which everybody agree on, crossing fingers hoping
no lag, no drops and no big problems arise, and if for some reasons you can´t finish the round in that date, get lucky and hoping all those factors work again
as expected before the deadline arrives. This is really the hard work and which make you feel well also after wining a round imho.
I´ve explained what i´m asking for over and over again Tomi, so if the rest of Clans agree with the actual system and haven´t anything to say i won´t insist more on it.
|
|||
Shurikenjitsu |
|||
|
Hello Lerend,
Just 2 things: 1> If my team have to lose by default of an opponent, an because of this cannot get the chance to get a tecnichal advance the round after, this I will call it unfair. Since is way more bigger the advantage that your team will have then the advantage my team had. By the way all the tournaments I have seen and partecipated (Totalwar or not), never penalized a player/team because having a default by opponents. 2>If you really want to talk about fairness, the perfect way would have been a final between 5 teams, and to eliminate the technical advance at all. But this is not easy to do, also in past Cwc we went the way we are doing, and was always considered fair. RAPAX Brutus |
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
Hello Brutus,
When you say that, i suppose you would believe fair also if a team moved forward 3 rounds due 2 consecutive defaults and 1 final technical advance while others would have to play and negotiate round after round… in spite of you can´t control defaults, you do can control technical advancements. My point is clear, a Clan shouldn´t enjoy a technical advancement in the same contest after having enjoyed the
"bonus" of moving forward without playing due 1 or consecutive defaults until the rest of Clans had enjoyed at least 1 time that "bonus"
too (technical or default advancement). That would be the fair thing for me. |
|||
Shurikenjitsu |
|||
|
Lerend, Your point is that a team that had a default advancement must be penalized, being excluded by the chance of a technical advancement that is given to anyone,
and you believe this would be fair. I believe it is not.
|
|||
CeltiberoLerend |
|||
|
No, no Brutus, my point is that every Clan should have the same chances to get an advance without playing. There is nothing more fair than that imo.
As for your example, i think is not reasonable cos´ why having a pass in the semifinal is way bigger advantage than having it 1 or 2 rounds before? what´s
the difference? isn´t necessary to have won a past round so you can get in semifinals? I don´t see any difference at all that justifies the advantage you´re
talking about.
Just think, you can have all rounds passing by defaults, even the final, would be fair? Yes, it is.I´m astonished, if you really believe that maybe something is working wrong, don´t you think so?. |
|||